Proposed Changes Would Protect Consumers from Deceptive Telemarketing

Consumers may get some added protection from fraudulent telemarketers under some proposed changes to the FTC’s Telemarketing Sales Rule. Right now, the Rule spells out when telemarketers can call and what they must say. The FTC has proposed changing the Rule to end the use of certain payment methods that fraudulent telemarketers prefer and as a result, increase protection for consumers.

The proposed changes would make it illegal for telemarketers and sellers to use unsigned checks and “remotely created payment orders,” payment methods that have allowed scammers to dip into consumers’ bank accounts without getting the proper authorization. The proposed changes also would bar telemarketers from using “cash-to-cash” money transfers and “cash reload” mechanisms, still other payment methods that fraudsters have used to take money quickly and anonymously.  

The TSR already bans telemarketers from asking for fees in advance when they offer to help someone recover money lost to a telemarketing fraud; in the FTC’s experience, those offers usually are part of a deceptive scheme. The Agency wants to expand that ban, so telemarketers can’t ask for an advance fee when they offer to help recover money from any prior transaction.

You can learn more about how to limit unwanted telemarketing calls, including pre-recorded calls, or you can read the full notice of proposed changes, and submit a comment.

Comments

some indian? pakistani? telemarketers are making my familys life miserable by callinf from 484 876 1474 /678 833 9357 and using extremely rubbish language and challenging me to go to govt to file complaint i did file complaint with ftc /verizon but no result.

Leave a Comment

Commenting Policy

Read Our Privacy Act Statement

It is your choice whether to submit a comment. If you do, you must create a user name, or we will not post your comment. The Federal Trade Commission Act authorizes this information collection for purposes of managing online comments. Comments and user names are part of the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) public records system, and user names also are part of the FTC’s computer user records system. We may routinely use these records as described in the FTC’s Privacy Act system notices. For more information on how the FTC handles information that we collect, please read our privacy policy.