You are here

FTC reaches settlement with anti-aging pill seller

Share this page

If you remember nothing else from this blog post, remember this: sellers that peddle cures must have scientific proof to back up their claims. The FTC takes action when they don’t.

Case in point: The FTC alleges that Quantum Wellness Botanical Institute, LLC, its CEO, Fred Auzene, and former marketer, Maria Gutierrez Veloso, deceptively advertised ReJuvenation, as an anti-aging wonder pill. Ads promised that ReJuvenation would reverse the aging process, repair damage to the body, and treat diseases by stimulating the production of human growth hormone (HGH) and stem cells. The defendants boldly claimed that ReJuvenation could reverse or repair heart attack damage, heart disease, blindness, brain damage from stroke, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, deafness, Crohn’s disease, and age-related damage to the body’s organs, tissues, and joints.

According to the FTC, the defendants worked hard to convince people to buy ReJuvenation, which cost between $39.95 and $49.95, plus shipping and handling, for a one-month supply.

In a proposed settlement announced today, the FTC says these claims were false or misleading, and the sellers had no reliable scientific evidence to back them up.

The proposed federal court orders would require the defendants to have human clinical testing to support future claims related to the treatment of any disease or health condition. The judgments total $3.4 million, which represents what people paid for ReJuvenation. After the defendants turn over $660,000, that money will be returned to ReJuvenation customers. The remainder of the judgment will be suspended due to inability to pay.

Be skeptical about ads promising miraculous results, or cures for lots of medical issues. Before you buy – or take – such a product, talk to a healthcare provider to make sure it’s right for you.

Check out for more information, and report any suspicious claims to the FTC.


Blog Topics: 
Health & Fitness


It would be nice to know exactly where these comments actually go. It is not possible to inquire with anyone after posting a comment to find out. There is no comment number, no designator as to who or what is complying any comment entry. Who owns the subcontracted software platform that these comments are being directed to, and surveilled by who, what, and where, as it is not possible to find any comment, after submission anywhere on the FTC publicly accessible site portals.

The FTC's Privacy Act Statement and Blog Comment Policy are posted directly above the box where you typed your comment. 

The FTC's Privacy Act Statement explains how the FTC treats comments and user names. The Blog Comment Policy explains how we moderate the blog and other issues.

They took in3.4 million and paid back 600 thousand???? Why? Where is the rest of the money?

Follow the link in the blog to read the press release. The court order against Veloso for $2.4 million will be partially suspended after payment of $600,000.

Leave a Comment